RIM’S PLAYBOOK HAS WON ME OVER.

Actually, that headline is somewhat incorrect.  I was already sold on the Playbook when I saw demonstrations of the device at the Mobile World Congress back in February 2012.  On full display at this event, it was hard to avoid it given Blackberry had one of the largest event displays at the conference.

Since purchasing the device, I have found myself using the Playbook far more often than my iPad (Gen 1) in many areas.  I just find the tablet far more portable and far more useful than the badly built Kindle Keyboard that died a mere week out of warranty.  Even more surprising is how well built the Playbook really is.  This is some solid-state technology at its best!  Nothing feels like garbage and it simply can’t compare to some of the crappy Android “tablets” out on the market.

Market perception that the Playbook isn’t a “premium” device is short-sighted thanks to biased media and simplistic assumptions of what makes a device good - sure, apps are far more bountiful through Apple’s AppStore, Google Play or Amazon AppStore.  But, more doesn’t mean better. Every ecosystem has its weaknesses — this includes Apple, Android and Microsoft. 

Which brings me to this point. If we ignore the tribal chatter of “my computer is better than yours” (nothing has changed since the Apple IIe vs. Commodore 64 days sadly :-)), and you focus on the really important stuff, the Playbook really stands out.  I actually prefer the Playbook OS 2.0 experience to Android.  Further, I believe there’s more than enough room globally to support a third and fourth ecosystem.  I could be wrong but I don’t see people complaining about Windows Phone or even the Playbook OS (minus the absence of a similar O/S experience on BB devices - it’s coming!). Even after doing some basic tests of Windows Phone 7 on my mom’s Nokia handset, I found it to be a likeable OS and U/X experience.

Also, the actual motion within Playbook 2.0 is “so fluid” (the scrolling), it’s simply beautiful.  When I would draw comparisons between iOS and Android, it was easy for me to suggest that this simple “feature” was better on iOS. Now, when I compare Playbook 2.0 and iOS, I can almost say without a doubt, the Playbook 2.0 O/S is visually more appealing than iOS.  Hands down.  It’s that good.

Playbook’s app ecosystem is growing.  I found a good bounty of “anchor brand” apps to keep the restless user happy.  I spent a bit of time over the weekend rewarding good app developers with actual purchases in several categories ranging from games, to productivity, to content-specific apps. There’s even a large assortment of mid-tier apps made by smaller developers that does a great job in keeping the ecosystem vibrant.  In fact, it’s this part of the ecosystem which reminds me of the old days when Apple’s MacOS (before Steve Jobs 2) had more quality “shareware” than a lot of the crappy “commercial” software found on the WinTel platform.  The mid-tier developer community really kept Apple alive during the lean, dark and difficult years. 

It is unfortunate that folks like Netflix have opted to NOT support the Playbook.  My view on that is simple.  It’s politically motivated. Especially, when you consider how deeply embedded Netflix is within Apple’s ecosystem since the TV “app” is included with the AppleTV out of box.  It’s sad that they feel they need to play that game because the Playbook’s capability cannot be questioned.  The video playback is amazing and so is the speed.  To be fair, both the Playbook and iPad don’t choke on their own own O/S but of late, with each new iOS upgrade, I have noticed the iPad stuttering to keep up which is probably an indication that I need to do a full, clean iOS install or the chip itself is at the heart of that issue.

There’s no doubt that BB10 (and yes, I BB10Believe) will be a strongly co-ordinated launch to release powerful touch-based and qwerty-based consumer/enterprise devices with a huge bounty of apps.  I do believe the new devices will surprise the skeptical media if they’re honest to themselves about balanced reporting.

I am ashamed that a lot of the Canadian media properties have had to be coerced into supporting the Playbook even as the tablet ranks second to the iPad in the Canadian market.  Yes, some of this was due to heavy price cutting but that’s beside the point.  I’d think differently (ha ha) if the tablet itself was of sub-standard quality. I would say the same if the O/S was terrible.  But the Playbook has an amazing O/S and it is solidly built!

Hey, this is the way I see it. If leading media properties like the Economist and the Globe and Mail can put their efforts forward to create a quality Playbook app, surely they must know something the other media properties don’t. I am actually quite impressed by the Techvibes Playbook app which was designed/built by Polar Mobile.  Functional, slick and fun to use.  So what are the rest of you waiting for?

#BB10Believe

Enhanced by Zemanta
Regrets about #iOS6 on my #iPhone #3GS.  

It’s slow.  I can’t get to my purchased screen in AppStore to see which apps are not installed on my iPhone via cloud sync.  Just feels too slow. 

I can appreciate Apple wanting to cater to the large installed 3GS base but this isn’t right. Better to cut things out.  Heck, I have an iPad 1 so already am cut out.  

See attached screen error. Never seen this in AppStore ever.  Another screen said I had a “WebObjects” error.

Regrets about #iOS6 on my #iPhone #3GS.

It’s slow. I can’t get to my purchased screen in AppStore to see which apps are not installed on my iPhone via cloud sync. Just feels too slow.

I can appreciate Apple wanting to cater to the large installed 3GS base but this isn’t right. Better to cut things out. Heck, I have an iPad 1 so already am cut out.

See attached screen error. Never seen this in AppStore ever. Another screen said I had a “WebObjects” error.

No wonder I couldn’t find last time. I thought it wasn’t released! But when I type “YouTube” in #appstore search, google’s new #YouTube app (“perfected for #iPhone) is showing up in 7th spot below the fold on my #3GS.
What’s that about #Apple? (Taken with Instagram)

No wonder I couldn’t find last time. I thought it wasn’t released! But when I type “YouTube” in #appstore search, google’s new #YouTube app (“perfected for #iPhone) is showing up in 7th spot below the fold on my #3GS.

What’s that about #Apple? (Taken with Instagram)

Enhanced by Zemanta
Unfortunately found these lying about in a pile OUTSIDE a #Starbucks looking like they were going to waste.  These redeem codes need love.  They expire November 27, 2012.

Unfortunately found these lying about in a pile OUTSIDE a #Starbucks looking like they were going to waste. These redeem codes need love. They expire November 27, 2012.

WHY IS TIM COOK TRYING TO HOSPITALIZE ME?

Image representing Tim Cook as depicted in Cru...

[LOL] Welcome.  Shoot me.  I am just as bad as the news media (CNN!) for using crazy headlines that have NOTHING to do with the article.  Well, this one is somewhat related.  However, it’s not Tim Cook’s fault.  I like Tim Cook.  Even E.T. likes Tim Cook.  He isn’t trying to hospitalize me.  Only the software is.

This is another “What Would Alex Bosika Do?” segment. :-)  

Here are the apps stats between iPhone and iPad:

iPhone

  1. Screens: 9 maximum
  2. Folders: 140 maximum
  3. Apps per Folder: 12 maximum
  4. Total Apps on iPhone: 2160 apps
iPad
  1. Screens: 9 maximum
  2. Folders: 220 maximum
  3. Apps per Folder: 20 maximum
  4. Total Apps for iPad: 4400 apps
PROBLEM:

With the introduction of iOS4, Apple introduced FOLDERS.  Folders allows extremely organized people to sort apps to their own drum beat.  That said, a few interesting things happen if you don’t organize yourself early.  

  1. If you exceed 9 screens with individual apps, any other apps are only accessible with iOS (Spotlight?) search - which is terribly inaccurate at times
  2. Sorting many individualized apps into folders can lead to quiet desperation, intense hospitalization or seizure and strokes (OK, I am kidding. Don’t sue me Apple!)  That said, the sorting process can be quite painful
  3. There is no iTunes desktop client sorting feature that I am aware which could help you sort you apps into folders more easily and more quickly than using gestures on the iPhone
  4. Surprisingly (I am pretty sure of this), Apple has not implemented some kind of magic sort that scans your entire iPhone device and by default sorts by genre/category, file size or alphabetical order into folders auto-magically
The last bullet may be hard to understand if you’ve never flooded your iPhone with apps like myself.  I currently have about 554 apps (and counting! YES! Call it “product tester hat”) and because they’re not sorted into folders, I can’t see most of them without an iOS search.  The only way to see the rest of the apps is through manual sortation and folder aggregation.  Do you now see how painful this?  It’s awful.  Even worse, the iTunes desktop client simply mimics (like an iPhone emulator) what I already see on my iPhone.  The only real way to get out of this sordid mess is to simply uncheck all apps on the iPhone via the iTunes desktop client, APPLY (!) and restart the process by individually checking apps I want installed on iPhone.  But rather than select all, I would have to select a reasonable amount, sort them to a folder, and then keep adding more so that I can maximum my app/folder organization.  

This sounds like a lot of work for a company that popularized the APP ecosystem and is generally considered logical when it comes to the gracefulness of their technology and software.
Scott Forstall (Apple’s Senior VP, iPhone/iOS Software), I am begging you.
Think about us app-aholics!

Before you know it, they’ll put me on Shutter Island or worse the Hoarders reality television program! Look at me, I’m a mess. :-) At 554 apps and counting, I’m in need of another hit. Help me organize my app life.

What Would Alex Bosika Do?
I would ensure iOS and iTunes had the capability to quickly sort hundreds and hundreds of apps into folders with some auto-naming convention (e.g. Category Name 1…2….3 depending on how many apps are associated to the category) for category sorts or something different for alphabetical sorting etc.
Trust me Apple.  This would make things just a little more helpful to people who test, download, or use a lot of apps.  Of course, the other solution would be to simply not install so many apps.  No, not possible with app-aholics.  Unless you’re suggesting I start an App-Aholics Anonymous.  Are you?
A Google search to find a solution to my problem turned up nothing. :-(
YES, TIM COOK.  I’m a happy camper in discovering this.  Please fix it. Meow.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Source: CNET

[BREAKING] 200 VIDEOS of Steve Jobs Aggregated Online

Kudos to the aggregator of fine content.  Something I wanted to do. :-)

Source: apple.com

400 MILLION STORE ACCOUNTS. 1-CLICK.

If this isn’t something to sneeze at, I don’t know what is.  May I point you to this article from Nick Bilton of the New York Times.  More info from AppleInsider.com.